The following twelve pages (frankly snooze-worthy reading) are an example of a testimony in the form of an affidavit which, when this post was originally published (Fall 2021), was in process of being served to the named “trespasser”. In October of 2022, the claim was heard, a grand jury found the claim to have “merit”, found the associated “true bill” valid, and seeks to issue indictments for “neglect to prevent” and non-performance of duties associated with the office and scope of authority.
Scales of “Just Us”.
If you are trying to learn how to write or organize such a document for your own purposes, an example can be the best thing to learn from. Again I state, this procedure is “in process”; and while a judgment is rendered, there remains the steps of publicly publishing and filing the action for future reference, as well as “enforcement” of such action. Enforcement, at this point, may depend upon the support of the same corporate government service corporations who both allowed and authored such fraud and extortion in the first place. We’ll update this post as we move forward with the process.
At the time of this update (Fall 2022), this claim is reviewed, deliberated, and a judgment is issued by a land and soil jurisdiction grand jury for certification by such jurisdiction justice. The grand jury is resolved to issue indictments as violations of maritime or admiralty jurisdiction statutes (commercial/contract law) are suspected; pursuit of which would be beneficial to the people in setting precedent. Such precedent would serve to guide other “agencies” to avoid similar trespass, error, and missteps as well as provide the grounds upon which those members of “we the people”, when trespassed, might base their own claims of remedy for damages.
The commercial jurisdiction statutes1 are the “rules” and the limits of authority by which the government service contractors are to provide service to the people. Become familiar with them and when the public servants exceed their authority and “damage the people”, it is both within the authority of the people and our responsibility as self-governing Americans to serve them notice and pull them back to operating within their granted scope of authority, or escort such actors, by lawful means, to jail.
You will be looking at the very format I have submitted and used for my process. The blanks are in effect “redacted” information of names, dates, and other specific information which doesn’t need to be shared on the internet. Publicly available information has been left intact. Such also makes a case for .jpg files.
I urge you to consider and learn from both good ideas and bad at this point or I would have just held such information until I had complete success to share. Hereby I attempt to provide copy for a given purpose for you to read, ideas to consider, and examples either good or bad from which to learn. I hope they serve you well.
Having had the grand jury certify the claim, the attending justice certifying the proceeding, the next hurdle in the process of holding the government actors in bad faith accountable is “enforcement“. It is one thing to collect evidence, another to allow for judicial process (examination of events and evidence with opportunity to defend), and yet another issue altogether to enforce indictments or “charges” when the land and soil jurisdiction on Arizona is currently not fully staffed with its own justices, sheriff, deputies, and other enforcement officers and tools.
…Yet another point in the case I continue to make that “an concerted effort for membership expansion should be among our top priorities”. We cannot fill the needed positions if we don’t have the population from which to choose those both willing and available to fill them, and those best suited and trained to fill them. Many have been willing to fill needed positions, and bless them for doing so. But the degree of damage in need of correction done our people’s government, country, and nation needs talented people passionate about the work at hand.
“While someone may kindly be willing to cut your hair for you, they may not be best suited to cut your hair.”
dp
Please visit our sponsors and merch sites on the [RECOMENDATIONS] page.
NOTE: Mobile users will have a better experience downloading the images (~350kb each) and viewing them enlarged. Desktop computer users will have a better experience either opening each image to it’s own tab (R-Click, “open image in new tab”) or by downloading each image and viewing them separately.
One of five businesses listed at the given address at the time the claim was written. One of “1409 companies in the Arizona Dept of Revenue corporate family”; a part of the …”Government Support Industry”… and not government itself; a hired contractor.
1 statutes – written text that outlines the bounds or excess of lawful action or behavior. Many of the writs or legal utterances only apply within the bounds of the authority wielded by the organization which issued them. By this standard, the statutes, ordinance, and code issued by the federal government service contractor only exist to govern, guide, and penalize (if necessary) those who serve or are employed by such contractor.
Men and women are governed by much simpler and shorter list of lawful expression known as “common law”; that which is common to the three main Western religions. This LAW, stemming directly from God’s law, deals mostly with trespass and damage, in the most general terms. “U.S. Citizens”, as far as the “federal government” currently occupying the government seat is concerned, are not men and women, but “federal citizens”, a willfully accepted office and scope of responsibility; a property interest of the state, fellow “employees”, and therefore subject to the same statutes.