From a presentation by David Straight in Arkansas, and points of interest from Brandon-Joe: Williams, details and references which we shall vet here and then arrange into an education, defense, and text for responses to IRS for sovereign Americans on their states. As with all posts on this site, this is an entry to my “online notebook”; always a work in progress, for which responsibility for any action you choose to take is yours alone.
image courtesy: Ponsulak on freedigitalphotos.net
STATUS: open for discussion; under construction
Resources: AVR #73, Cornell Legal Information Institute, David Straight in Arkansas 2019, A Reply to the IRS, AVR #438 The True History of the Income Tax and IRS; AVR #851 Service and Taxation; AVR #3825 Nothing is Coincidence; 26 CFR §1.6013-6; 26 USC §1362, 26 USC §7806;
Please visit our sponsors and merch sites on the [RECOMENDATIONS] page.
His biggest point thus far, which covers the rest, is:
“You must:
- declare your status
- know your standing
- establish your jurisdiction
Notes & Comments:
The 928 paperwork bears notice of your status.
Standing suggests your rights to defend; jurisdiction their lack of right to assault.
In general and overall…
With Title 26 of the United States Code standing as the “tax code” and “law” to which the “IRS” so often refers:
26 USC §7806: Construction of title
(a) “cross references in this title… shall be given no legal effect.”
(b) No inference, implication, or presumption of legislative construction shall be drawn or made… of this title be given any legal effect. The preceding sentence also applies to the sidenotes and ancillary tables contained in the various prints of this Act before its enactment into law.
Edited specifically to “cut to the chase” of the meaning, rather than bog the reader into their associations and altered definitions. Reading §7806 as written in context is recommended.
There is some question as to whether Title 26 was ever officially “enacted”, therefore, is not even law within its intended jurisdiction. (?)
As applied to “men”:
26 USC §1362: Election; revocation; termination
(a)(2) All shareholders must consent to election
(burden of proof upon government, prove “shareholder” status, rather than “co-beneficiary”?).
(d) Termination
(1) by REVOCATION
(A) In general, an election under subsection (a) may be terminated by revocation
(B) More than one-half of shares must consent to revocation… (more specified)
(C) When effective
(i) ~first day of taxable year if revocation is prior to day 15 of month 3
(ii) ~first day of next taxable year if revocation is after day 15 of month 3
(D) Revocation may specify prospective date
Apparently within Title 26 of the United States Code, there is provision for this, even if one is within such jurisdiction (as with U.S. Citizens); revocation is a valid choice.
See “small business corporation” as (1) “a domestic corporation… which does not…” (2)(C) have a nonresident alien as a shareholder” [see 26 USC §1364(b)(1)]
While applicable to a smaller jurisdiction, only those federal employees subject to the Code for Federal Regulations (CFR), this also illustrates that election is voluntary, even if accepted under full disclosure of terms and conditions, and is subject to revocation.
26 CRF §15.1-2 Revocation of Election to deduct
(a) Manner of revoking election. A taxpayer may revoke an election made by him under section 615(e) or section 617(a) by filing with the internal revenue officer with whom the taxpayer’s income tax return is required to be filed, within the periods set forth in paragraph (b) of this section, a statement, signed by the taxpayer or his authorized representative, which sets forth that the taxpayer is revoking the election previously made by him…”
[per 26 CFR Part 1 – PART 1 §1.615-6 Election to deduct…
26 USC §615: (repealed)]
[per 26 USC §617 or
26 CFR §1.617-1(c) Elections (3)Revocations]
This section is less pertinent than §1362 above, but is provided to establish a pattern.
Note that these are illustrated to pertain to mining operations… whether mining mineral deposits or mining your value and livelihood is why all this garbage is “encoded”. A careful and well defined read may reveal what is subject to being mined.
As applied to businesses / sub-corporations:
26 USC §992: Requirements of a domestic international sales corporation (note definitions)
(b)(3) Termination of Election
26 USC §7701: Definitions
(a)(4) Domestic “…means created or organized in the United States or under the law of the United States…”
(a)(9) “United States”: “…when used in a geographical sense includes only the States and the District of Columbia [see also: “28 USC §3002(a)(15) “…a federal corporation”]
(a)(10) “State …shall be construed to include the District of Columbia, where such construction is necessary to carry out provisions of this title.”
DISC: Domestic International Sales Corporation; a corporation incorporated under the laws of any State with (A) 95% or more “qualified export receipts“; defined per 26 USC §992(a)(1) [MORE]
Reference: IRC Section 26 USC 501(a) establishes the right to not provide or operate under a Social Security Number (SSN) or Tax Identification Number (TIN) on grounds of discrimination. (verify) They must “ask for your SSN”, but it is a violation of 42 USC 408 to “compel” such disclosure:
42 USC 408: Penalties
(a)(8): whoever… “discloses, uses, or compels the disclosure of the social security number of any person in violation of the laws of the United States“
18 USC 912: Officer or Employee of the United States
Whoever falsely assumes or pretends to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of the United States or any department, agency or officer thereof, and acts as such, or in such pretended character demands or obtains any money, paper, document, or thing of value, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
26 USC 6109(a)(i)(4):
(4) Distinguishing ITINs… treaty benefits
The Secretary shall implement a system that ensures that individual taxpayer identification numbers issued solely for purposes of claiming tax treaty benefits are used only for such purposes, by distinguishing such numbers from other individual taxpayer identification numbers issued.
(still agreeing to “taxpayer” status)
Class Action Suit – IRS vs. [750,000] $175M
fictitious obligations of needing SSN, PTIN, TIN, or EIN when not actually required. (case reference)
Notes & Comments:
A God Trust : under 26 USC §501(a)
26 USC 6033: “Except as provided in paragraph (3), every organization exempt from taxation under section 501(a) shall file an annual return…”
(3) Exceptions from filing
(A) Mandatory exceptions
(1) shall not apply to—
(i) churches, their integrated auxiliaries, and conventions or associations of churches,
(iii) the exclusively religious activities of any religious order.
Notes & Comments:
Under a God Trust, all that you own belongs to God; you are merely the trustee, the steward while you remain, the steward who will pass such blessings to your heir. (dp)
Genesis 1:26
Genesis 15:4
Isaiah 9:6-8
Luke 12:13-15
Luke 12: 29-31
“your Father knoweth…”
Stewardship: correct your priorities and “all things will be added unto you.” – dp
Case Reference: US vs. Lloyd (?) “IRS cannot assess if you don’t file”
(verify)
Notes & Comments:
Case Reference: For Banking and Credit Union account applications, no requirement to supply SSN/TIN. The bank is only required to file an affidavit attached to the account that “the client was asked, denied to supply a SSN/TIN”. Otherwise is “discriminatory”.
(verify)
Notes & Comments:
Case Reference: US Supreme Court in Fora (?) vs. US: “US Tax is a system of voluntary assessment and payment and not distraint (?)”
(verify)
Notes & Comments:
26 CFR §1.6013-6 Election… non-resident alien
(b)(1) Revocation;
Case Reference: Internal Revenue Audit Manual (1975) “US Tax is self-assessment / voluntary”
(verify)
Notes & Comments:
26 CFR §1.6013-6 Election… non-resident alien
(b)(1) Revocation;
Case Reference: US vs. Kahriger, US Supreme Court, Hugo Black: “US system of tax by confession”
(verify)
Notes & Comments:
Case Reference: Diversified Metal Products vs. IRS: “IRS is not part of the Federal Government”
is there a Dunn & Bradstreet number?
(verify)
Notes & Comments:
Case Reference: Public Law 94564 (?)
(verify)
Notes & Comments:
Case Reference: Public Law 102391 (?)
(verify)
Notes & Comments:
Case Reference: Senate Report 941148 (?)
(verify)
Notes & Comments:
Case Reference: IRS was re-incorporated (1933), originally incorporated 1925 under Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms out of Puerto Rico
(verify)
Notes & Comments:
Defending Yourself:
Fraud – there is no statute of limitation on fraud, and many of the activities used against sovereign Americans is simply fraud.
Officers of these fraudulent “government actors” have no public office, no public bond, and no foreign state immunity (AVR#73)
Notes & Comments:
Reference:
(Verify – Citation?)
When addressing Continental Citizens upon land jurisdiction as if they were Citizens of the Federal United States is acting under color of law.
Threatening a living inhabitant of the Continental United States with [any weapon] is an act of inland piracy for which the penalty can be death by hanging.
Notes & Comments:
Reference: AVR#73
Title 18, Section 242: Depravation of Rights Under Color of Law (law.cornell.edu)
(Verify – Citation?)
Acts of plunder, mortal violence, and mischaracterization of civilians as combatants are all offenses punishable by death.
Notes & Comments:
Reference: AVR#73
(Verify – Citation?)
Personage: press-ganging land assets into the international jurisdiction of the sea, a crime outlawed for 200 years; recognized as an act of inland piracy which carries the death penalty.
Deliberately confusing living people with corporate franchises merely named after them is an act of personage.
Mischaracterizing the identity of citizenship status of a birthright Citizen of the Continental United States is also a crime under the Geneva Protocols of 1949, Volume II, Article 3; which also carries the death penalty.
Notes & Comments:
Reference: AVR#73
(Verify – Citation?)
Verify: Geneva Protocols of 1949, volume 2, Article 3
What is Revised Statute 2165 ??
Note for Churches and Religious Organizations
26 USC 501(c)(3): exemptions for “any…operated exclusively for religious…purposes”
26 USC 501(h)(5): organizations disqualified [from taxation or exemption?] for purposes of paragraph (c)(3) [above] are:
(A) contributions described: 26 USC 170(b)(1)(A)(i): exempt are “Any charitable contribution to—(i) a church or a convention or association of churches”
(B) an integrated auxiliary of a church or of a convention or association of churches, or
(C) a member of an affiliated group of organizations (within the meaning of section 4911(f)(2) if one or more members of such group is described in subparagraph (A) or (B)
26 USC 4911(f)(2) Definition of affiliation
For purposes of paragraph (1), two organizations are members of an affiliated group of organizations but only if:
(A) the governing instrument of one such organization requires it to be bound by decisions of the other organization on legislative issues, or
(B) the governing board of one such organization includes persons who—
(i) are specifically designated representatives of another such organization or are members of the governing board, officers, or paid executive staff members of such other organization, and
(ii) by aggregating their votes, have sufficient voting power to cause or prevent action on legislative issues by the first such organization.
I have researched the D&B http://www.dnb.com site I explored the number lookup tab. I looked for Internal Revenue Service in Georgia. There were no less than 5 pages in that state alone. On the 4th page there are four businesses titled “United States Internal Revenue Service” those begin the out of business listings which continue on the 5th page. However after the four they do resume “Internal Revenue Service” Also I want to add that 5 of these were not o.o.b. in my earlier search today. I will look back in the morning to monitor if they may be closing as we speak or not.
I hope this helps you and others paint a bigger picture.
Title 18, Section 242: Depravation of Rights Under Color of Law
Verified from Cornell law School
LII U.S. Code Title 18 PART I CHAPTER 13 § 242
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
I hope this helps, D
With something like this that’s already a developed idea, let’s just reference the link rather than restate everything… make our site pretty visually heavy, when if someone wants to read the original, we can just locate it for them, link it, and let them go read it… ;-D